2 Likes
Seriously though…stripped of titles? Oh no…not ma titles and having to move into just a massive house. What a punishment.
He’s got away with raping a 17 year old. The dirty footlicking bastard. Fuck off to jail like the plebs.
3 Likes
New guy came onto a project I was on and dropped in that he use to be Andrew’s personal carpenter. Yeahhh should just wipe that off your resume mate.
Someone gave him a pizza express voucher for Xmas which was fucking funny.
5 Likes
So if Andys been kicked out of his house and stripped of titles, does he need to sign on and get a council flat?
2 Likes
If only Sue Townsend were still alive to write “The Nonce and I”
2 Likes
Did Andrew ever have trouble getting wood?
1 Like
1 Like
Thirstiest of all knighthoods:
1 Like
He’s been Sir Dave for years unofficially!
1 Like
Gary Barlow will be seething, he’s been dry-humping a knighthood for years
2 Likes
thought they were both already knights tbh
1 Like
Although I’m at the point now that unless they have a live feed of him on the White House front lawn raping a minor he’ll just keep dodging bullets till the big beautiful stroke takes him
4 Likes
I find it rather ironic that a man who twists the truth and lies through his teeth every time he opens his mouth is suing a foreign broadcaster for “false, defamatory, disparaging and inflammatory statements” for editing a speech he made that resulted in the Capitol building being stormed by a mob.
3 Likes
Trump is dodgy as anything - but so was the BBC edit. The original version said something like ‘We’re going to march to the Capitol and we’re going to protest peacefully and patriotically,’ and they’d spliced it with a part from 45 minutes later so it looked like he was saying We’re going to march to the Capitol and we’re going to fight like hell.’
1 Like
Oh yes. Equally dodgy. Deffo.
2 Likes
So fucking stupid of them to edit it that way though. It was bad enough already. Literally everyone knows what happened, apart from people who only watch fox maybe. He said what he said and did what he did and what happened happened, there was no reason to try to make it look worse.
3 Likes
Exactly - there was plenty of material to show Trump for what he is. Now his supporters can all just say Fake News!
1 Like
Yup. Inexplicable really.
Seeing as no one apart from a right wing tweaker specifically, forensically looking for example of bias (all against right wingers of course) noticed for nearly 3 years, it probably didn’t cause one billion dollars worth of damage to the great wotsits reputation.
Remember when Corbyn sued the BBC for this? Remember when all the people who care deeply about bias at the BBC were fucking kicking right off over this?
Oh yeah…
1 Like
There’s a thing psychologists call moral licence.
If you know that you (e.g. a journalist) are a good person, and someone else (e.g. Trump. Or Corbyn) is clearly and obviously a bad person, then whatever you do, however outrageous, is always going to be good, because it comes from a good place. And you just don’t even see or consider how any sane person could see it in any other way.
And then you get sued for a billion dollars.
