The Dyson we had would do about 3 minutes of vacuuming before crapping out and needing to be charged.
Whereas the Shark just seems a lot more powerful, and will do as much vacuuming as we do in any one session of vacuuming in a 3 bedroom townhouse.
They’re also a lot more expensive here at least.
Shark pet hair cordless. Can do the whole house on one charge and it pulls up all my dogs hair really well.
Dyson just does not do what it says it will do and the shark tells you it’s doing it and drags you along growling with hunger.
Shark because I refuse to give James Dyson money as he is a Michael Fabricant.
@Mark i think I have some shark voucher codes. I saved £200 or something like that when I bought mine.
I have 2 dogs that moult a lot. The Dyson literally did nothing, I was better off rubbing my shoes and picking it up by hand. The shark actually works as a vacuum, we have a regular one, not the pet specific one.
Only thing I would say is we should pick up an extra battery, the battery is fine, but inevitably one of us forgets to put it on change when it’s nearly flat.
Also what @neddy said.
I got the pet hair one because both my Mrs and I have long hair, it’s fucked how much it picks up
Alright hairy arms.
EDIT … ffs baha
Have a cordless handheld shark for the caravan. Its good. Same umbrella as Ninja.
Good spare supplies via their website.
We use a G Tech; it’s definitely handy when you want to do a quick clean but nothing beats henry the hoover. The cordless ones just don’t have enough power.
Managed to get out for a skate. Had more fun outside the park ollieing over the speed bumps then trying to hit the slappy kerb after.
Shark with a cord here. Mega powerful.
Had 2 dysons they broke and didn’t suck good enough
Voltarol are targeting me on Instagram with adverts containing a helmeted old man smiling through the pain.
Bra-vo!!! 
I’m getting those too.
Also, for a wrap crimping gadget called a crimpit.
(Which I actually fell for and bought. It’s ace!)
Just by looking at the guy I can tell it’s lower back
