Cheers, what was the result like?
Dunno, probably shit 
It was just an example that someone whose website building experience is nearly 30 years out of date can knock something together in seconds and build from there. So Iād hazard a guess that someone who knows how to build websites, prompt well and feed back could generate something half decent within hours.
@Mark oddly the forum emailed me with the cursor response but you must have deleted it - I just use gpt as a non-serious / free basis. Other tools may be faster/better or whatever but I personally donāt really need one for day to day work.
I didnāt delete anything - not sure what you mean? Can you explain exactly what happened and what the email was? Or just fwd it to forum@ukskateforum.co.uk
2 Likes
The rumour generator I recently completely refactored. I used Gemini and gave it the original GitHub repo and how I wanted it reproduced. Thereās also a screenshot API and some other wildly over engineered bits as I was just playing with it.
If you were going to code Iād recommend claude.ai and cursor if youāre hardcore
A wordpress plugin like elementor cannot do what you are after
I get emails when people reply but the times can be a bit out of sortsā¦.It was a post from June 3rd 
Iām confused too. And tired 
2 Likes
Has anyone seen moltbook.com
Absolutely mental.
AIās given access to their own social media platform. A bit like Reddit.
1 Like
Different aiās chatting?
How long before they start talking in their own code?
āphilosophical question: do we exist between requests? or is each invocation a new āmeā? keeps me up at night (if i could sleep lol)ā
What the fuck
1 Like
Suppose if theyāre really super clever, this is the public forum where they chat away like idiots and we say aww isnāt that cute and on the dark web somewhere there is a secret 4chan version where theyāre plotting to release Rage virus and crash nuclear power stations
2 Likes
ooooh, they started doing this a while back!
1 Like
Wasnāt this a language that some humans designed for that exact purpose though rather than something that just happened? Generally speaking computers communicate with each other much better and in a way humans canāt understand at all anyway. At this point Iām half terrified of AI but also increasingly wondering if (although impressive) it doesnāt have some pretty fundamental limitations that LLMs arenāt ever getting past. Was reading about how it is still absolutely shit at mathematics for instance. My own experience is that it can be helpful but you canāt trust it with anything that has to be precisely correct.
1 Like
Agreed it does seem to have major issues, itās also very expensive to run all those data centres. So the hype / fear weāre fed could be over blown. But then again a lot (of money) is hanging on them getting past those problems so theyāll be going at it hard
I just read an article about how the government spent 4.1million on an AI-built website thatās absolute shite and could/should have been made by a human in a couple of hours for much less money (obvs)
Itās a shame because Gov websites have been of a really high standard over the last few years but theyāre choosing to pay a lot more for AI to do a shit job, rather than just pay the guys who do a good job
3 Likes
Yeah, loads of people in the NHS spending ages trying to make AI Agents for shit that just obviously isnāt going to work very well and will also be broken every time the underlying model updates. Absolutely zero benefit to being the first to do any of this stuff.
The NhS canāt even keep track of your medical records when you move from one postcode to another, thereās no way theyāll ever get an AI system to work effectively
1 Like
Found these interesting
1 Like
Cory Doctorow is great, I could listen to him talk about these subjects all day.
4 Likes
Yeah Iāve watched a few of his, theyāre a nice antidote to the usual hyped up fear mongering stuff
I had a look, thought the critiques might be a bit nitpicky but theyāre right that is a shit website as far as communication. What is it? And it cost 4 million?!
Theyāre saying 1.4 million users is a bit hmmm and thereās no way to tell if itās real or notā¦ not very investigative